On 27 August 2015 at 08:26, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dne 27.8.2015 v 16:09 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): >> >> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 03:13:08 PM Richard Z wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:12:25PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >>>> >>>> Their FAQ is constantly updated: >>>> >>>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing#FAQ >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if there is a valid practical reason to refuse submitting >>>> the >>>> addons that we ship to their signing service or if it is against our >>>> policies; at least mozilla-https-everywhere has been signed. >>> >>> >>> that would work for Fedora - if it can be guaranteed that they sign new >>> versions quickly. Immagine if one of our plugins had a security hole and >>> mozilla would need days or weeks to sign it. As far as I can see Fedora >>> specific extensions would have to be listed which means they would go >>> through manual code review at mozilla. >> >> We have no real practical way to do this other than package up the addon >> and >> build it as a -unsigned package, then making a separate package that has >> the >> precompiled binary and signed by mozilla and put into the add on package. >> >> It sounds like the path mozilla is taking will likely prevent us shipping >> addons in Fedora. That of course is their right to pursue that. >> > > > I'm wondering what is good replacement option - since the amount of troubles > with Firefox seems to be just scaling up. > > The memory usage - is the story for it self - displaying a tab with just our > bugzilla pages eats like 6-8M of RAM - I used to be running full OS with > this amount of RAM - now it's not enough to render couple lines and color > boxes and 'couple' KB of text.... > > Keyboard and mouse has weird focus - so often I type in one windows, but > keyboard input magically work in another window (i.e. Ctrl+T opens new tab > in second window) > > I've no chance to control what is downloaded - I could partially limit thing > by using plugins - but they eats possibly more RAM, slows FF down (at least > by FF reporting messages) and will likely be sooner or later banned. > > Lot's of things are hardly reportable. > > Chrome is not an option for me - it eats even more RAM and slows my machine > even more then FF. > > So what are the option - if the person want to view Web with all modern > technologies being supported ? > > You can't have that last part with the first parts. If you require the 'modern' technologies then you have to put up with their RAM/CPU eating glory. Or start from scratch and see if you can build a toolkit that does it better. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
