Re: Package repositories missing both a spec file and a dead.package file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:45:30PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> EPEL-only packages should have their devel branch (and any other Fedora
>> branches if they were already created) properly retired including adding the
>> dead.package file. It can say something like "EPEL-only package."
>
> EPEL-only packages should be retired as described in the FAQ:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Is_it_possible_to_get_a_package_only_into_EPEL_and_not_Fedora.3F
>
> Regards
> Till

Thanks Kevin and Till. I've done the Rawhide retirement for
mod_proxy_fcgi (an EPEL 6-only package).

- Ken
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux