Re: Package repositories missing both a spec file and a dead.package file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:48:44 -0400 (EDT), Viktor Jancik wrote:

> Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch.
> 
> Is this desired? Here is the list:

[...]

> I came to the conclusion, that these repositories are simply missing a dead.package file. I apologize for any false positives.
>

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/autoconf268.git/log/

Initial setup of the repoHEADmasterf23	Fedora Release Engineering	2015-03-11	2	-0/+0

Looks like a new package request. Five months old without any activity
from the maintainer in the master and f23 branches. But a package has been
imported into the el6 branch.

It smells like grey area. Could it be a package for EL6 only?
What to do with the Rawhide master branch then? Perhaps it's not obvious
whether to mark it dead in that case.

Here's the review's SCM Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375#c7

Branches: el6

Voila! The process instructions don't give a hint what to do with the implicitly
created master/devel branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux