Am 17.08.2015 um 01:22 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Am 16.08.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:It's a basic violation of the ordinary segregation between "/bin" as ordinary user tools" and "/sbin" as sysadmin tools to start mixing them, and much more confusing to have the same program name in both. And it's frankly easy to avoid. "mock", for example, should rename "/.sbin/mock" to something else to avoid command line confusionnonsense ./sbin/ is nowehre in the FHS ./sbin/ is not below/usr ./sbin is not protected ReadOnlyDirectories=/usr /usr/lib/appname and /usr/libexec exists/sbin isn't a separate filesystem, it is a subdirectory of "/", and it's explicitly mentioned at http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-3.14.html as requiring copies or symlinks to certain specific, long-stable program names. Let me quote that document:Ahhh, I am sorry, I may have contributed to the confusion by mistyping "/sbin" as ""/.sbin". I'm on a new email interface, and am having some difficulty with "overwriting" as opposed to my preferred default "insertion" for editing. But that was my own fault
the same nonsense /sbin is the same as /usr/sbin for a long time now
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
