Am 17.08.2015 um 00:24 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Am 16.08.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:It's a basic violation of the ordinary segregation between "/bin" as ordinary user tools" and "/sbin" as sysadmin tools to start mixing them, and much more confusing to have the same program name in both. And it's frankly easy to avoid. "mock", for example, should rename "/.sbin/mock" to something else to avoid command line confusionnonsense ./sbin/ is nowehre in the FHS ./sbin/ is not below/usr ./sbin is not protected ReadOnlyDirectories=/usr /usr/lib/appname and /usr/libexec exists/sbin isn't a separate filesystem, it is a subdirectory of "/", and it's explicitly mentioned at http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-3.14.html as requiring copies or symlinks to certain specific, long-stable program names. Let me quote that document:3.14.1 Purpose Utilities used for system administration (and other root-only commands) are stored in /sbin, /usr/sbin, and /usr/local/sbin. /sbin contains binaries essential for booting, restoring, recovering, and/or repairing the system in addition to the binaries in /bin.[footnote 15]
* these days are gone * they where gone long before usrMove because in reality the purpose of /sbin did *not* work for many years * UsrMove happened * ReadOnlyDirectories=/usr is one of the UsrMove benefits * your ./sbin is mentioned nowhere in the FHS * FHS is outdated * the rescue system these days is in the dracutrd * you would damage all benefits of UsrMove for no gain * hidden directories are badwhile i often have hard critics for systemd upstream it's never just for the purpose of trolling and personal attacking - think about that
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
