On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:02:49 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> "dnf list autoremove" gives *nothing* while "dnf remove wget" as one of > >> many samples could be removed without any deps - so i guess that's just > >> working with the yumdb/dnfdb and is in *no way* compareable with > >> "package-cleanup --leaves --all" > > > > Noticably, I didn't claim otherwise. I only answered your question. ;-) > > no, you did not, Uh, come on, Harald! Let me quote. You wrote: | so, upgraded to F23 with "dnf distro-sync" and how do dnf-developers and | the people decided to replace yum at the moment imagine cleanup setups now? To which I pointed you at their manual, which explicitly comments on the "package-cleanup --leaves" command you had tried before. Now, whether the replacements works or is broken, that's not what you had asked. > > And yes, some of the "replacements" are not 100% compatible. I've just > > had a bugzilla ticket about "dnf repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64" not > > reporting anything anymore be closed in a weird way > > well, I'm curious which part of Fedora is damaged next for years..... Let's replace Tracker, please. For several days in Rawhide, it crashes everytime I boot the system. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
