Re: package-cleanup after F21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 11.08.2015 um 17:58 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:46:28 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:

See 'man yum2dnf' for more information.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ^^^
    ^^
    ^
    (!) Scroll down to the bottom

"dnf list autoremove" gives *nothing* while "dnf remove wget" as one of
many samples could be removed without any deps - so i guess that's just
working with the yumdb/dnfdb and is in *no way* compareable with
"package-cleanup --leaves --all"

Noticably, I didn't claim otherwise. I only answered your question. ;-)

no, you did not, bseides dnf/yum "yum autoremove" is by far compareable with "package cleanup --leaves / package-cleanup --leaves --all"

the yumdb/dnfdb is nothing important and until now you can rm -rf the whole folder daily because it just wastes space - there is a database about dependencies and apckages and it's called rpm

And yes, some of the "replacements" are not 100% compatible. I've just
had a bugzilla ticket about "dnf repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64" not
reporting anything anymore be closed in a weird way

well, I'm curious which part of Fedora is damaged next for years.....

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux