Re: svn or arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

> 
> Interesting. Any plans for RedHat/Fedora to switch
> to Conary?
> One difference between this proposal and conary is
> that we would
> try to remain compatible with a .rpm based system.
> In other
> words, the output of our system would be regular
> .src.rpm's
> that could be built/installed/etc. by existing
> tools.

rpm might be considered a legacy format if conary is
choosen but I am not sure its past the experimental
stage yet. It has been developed by ex redhat guys and
I saw a few people blogging about it. The presentation
on kernel meet was interesting

=====
Regards
Rahul Sundaram


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good. 
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux