On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:46:53PM -0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I suspect we would end up with something like conary > if we design a build system on top of arch. Interesting. Any plans for RedHat/Fedora to switch to Conary? One difference between this proposal and conary is that we would try to remain compatible with a .rpm based system. In other words, the output of our system would be regular .src.rpm's that could be built/installed/etc. by existing tools. But the question is if it's worth pursuing this. If Fedora intends to use conary in the (near) future, puting up with the CVS-based system may be the smartest thing to do. -- Dimi.
