Re: Question about profile.d scripts definition in Spec file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 06:37:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, at 01:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > Either %config or %config(noreplace) can cause problems during update.
> > Neither one is completely safe with regard to breaking a program at
> > runtime. It can be necessary to switch from %config(noreplace) to %config,
> > or vice versa, in updates.
> 
> FWIW rpm-ostree (really ostree) consistently uses the equivalent of
> %config(noreplace) always for everything in /etc, regardless of what the
> input RPM says.
> 
> I think global predictability and consistency here is superior to
> per-package choice.

MUST: Admin must painstakingly review and handle all .rpmnew/.rpmsave files,
which are created when installing an update.

Aiming for consistency, I agree with that. Predictability? Nah. Both %config
and %config(noreplace) bear risks.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux