On 2 August 2015 at 15:29, Marcin Haba <marcin.haba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My image of configuration files is that they are files for read/write > purpose by design, because they enables _configure_ something > (application, service, single program, script...whatever). If they are > dedicated only for reading then from my point of view they lose > "configuration" meaning (something like WORM storage ;-) ). > This is probably an argument for having shell configuration fragments packaged under /usr/lib/bash/profile.d rather than /etc/profile.d. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
