Re: FreeTDS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, that would mean (for example)
main package ships *only* libct.so.2.0.0, nothing more
and the devel package would ship the symlink libct.so to libct.so.2.0.0
After one compiled e.g. php, php *knows* it needs libct.so.2.0.0 and
therefore doesn't need the symlink to libct.so anymore, and the devel
could be whiped away after all.

Am I right ?

Michael Schwendt schrieb:

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:33:26 +0100, Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens wrote:



Ok.
I first thought it was about *all* .so files.
But why don't the symlinks don't belong into main ?
Don't they need to be there for versioning ?



What kind of "versioning"?

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-December/msg00705.html





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux