On 02.08.2015 23:58, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 2 August 2015 at 22:57, Jonathan Underwood > <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2 August 2015 at 15:29, Marcin Haba <marcin.haba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> My image of configuration files is that they are files for read/write >>> purpose by design, because they enables _configure_ something >>> (application, service, single program, script...whatever). If they are >>> dedicated only for reading then from my point of view they lose >>> "configuration" meaning (something like WORM storage ;-) ). >>> >> >> This is probably an argument for having shell configuration fragments >> packaged under /usr/lib/bash/profile.d rather than /etc/profile.d. > > .. or /usr/share/bash/profile.d, perhaps. Hello Jonathan, That is also good idea, I think. Thanks. Best regards. Marcin Haba
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
