Re: Question about profile.d scripts definition in Spec file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02.08.2015 23:58, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 2 August 2015 at 22:57, Jonathan Underwood
> <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2 August 2015 at 15:29, Marcin Haba <marcin.haba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> My image of configuration files is that they are files for read/write
>>> purpose by design, because they enables _configure_ something
>>> (application, service, single program, script...whatever). If they are
>>> dedicated only for reading then from my point of view they lose
>>> "configuration" meaning (something like WORM storage ;-) ).
>>>
>>
>> This is probably an argument for having shell configuration fragments
>> packaged under /usr/lib/bash/profile.d rather than /etc/profile.d.
> 
> .. or /usr/share/bash/profile.d, perhaps.

Hello Jonathan,

That is also good idea, I think.
Thanks.

Best regards.
Marcin Haba


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux