On 02.08.2015 08:54, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/02/2015 08:39 AM, Marcin Haba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to make informal review following feature request: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353 >> >> One from warnings returned by rpmlint is: >> >> ossim-data.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/ossim.sh >> >> Because ossim.sh is not configuration file but shell script (as usual in >> profile.d/) I had a doubt about treating this warning. > > Well, I sense a misinterpretation of "%config". > > In the context of the /etc file hierarchy "%config" means > "user-customizable", which means rpm/yum/dnf updates must not destroy > any changes a user may have applied and should backup instead. > >> So I asked on fedora-review IRC channel and there I received answer that >> this warning is acceptable. > Well, it's a minor issue, but it definitely is arguable. > >> In the bugzilla task I received answer that for the ossim.sh file should >> be used %config macro. >> >> My question is: what is valid answer for this case? > > My recommendation is to use %config. Hello Ralf, Thanks for your advise. I added the thread link to bugzilla ticket. If somebody has a different opinion in this matter, please answer in this thread. Best regards. Marcin Haba
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
