On 08/02/2015 08:39 AM, Marcin Haba wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to make informal review following feature request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353
One from warnings returned by rpmlint is:
ossim-data.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/ossim.sh
Because ossim.sh is not configuration file but shell script (as usual in
profile.d/) I had a doubt about treating this warning.
Well, I sense a misinterpretation of "%config".
In the context of the /etc file hierarchy "%config" means
"user-customizable", which means rpm/yum/dnf updates must not destroy
any changes a user may have applied and should backup instead.
So I asked on fedora-review IRC channel and there I received answer that
this warning is acceptable.
Well, it's a minor issue, but it definitely is arguable.
In the bugzilla task I received answer that for the ossim.sh file should
be used %config macro.
My question is: what is valid answer for this case?
My recommendation is to use %config.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
