Re: About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 01.08.2015 um 23:05 schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 07/28/2015 06:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Actually, reproducable builds wrt. docs have been subject to Fedora
Packaging since Fedora day #1 and repeatedly have been subject to
discussions of details (e.g. doxygen repeatedly had introduced docs
breakages)

Packages which do not comply to this rule are broken.

Can you provide a citation in the guidelines?  As far as I can tell,
javadoc hasn't been patched not to put the build date into the resulting
HTML documentation, so a lot of Java packages are not compliant with the
above

it's simply not true - there are no reproducable builds in Fedora and frankly currently very few distributions have them at all

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux