On 07/28/2015 06:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Actually, reproducable builds wrt. docs have been subject to Fedora > Packaging since Fedora day #1 and repeatedly have been subject to > discussions of details (e.g. doxygen repeatedly had introduced docs > breakages) > > Packages which do not comply to this rule are broken. Can you provide a citation in the guidelines? As far as I can tell, javadoc hasn't been patched not to put the build date into the resulting HTML documentation, so a lot of Java packages are not compliant with the above. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
