On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28/07/15 14:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 27/07/15 19:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to > > > > > > > email > > > > > > > me or > > > > > > > ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be > > > > > > > happy > > > > > > > to help. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a work-in-progress list of FTBFS packages: > > > > > > > > > > > > * Build failures: > > > > > > > > > > > > - F23 + Rawhide > > > > > > > > > > > > ledger > > > > > > > > This patch is needed to make Ledger compile with Boost 1.58.0 > > > > > > I submitted a build using the patch you submitted as an upstream > > > PR - > > > https://github.com/ledger/ledger/pull/422 - but it still failed: > > > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9527/10499527/buil > > > d.log > > > > Yes, as well as my patch for #422 you still need the second half of > > the patch for the upstream #417 (which was not reverted), which > > I've > > attached to this mail. > > Oh, and then it *still* fails because of unpackaged files, see > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1167/10501167/build.lo > g > which I did yesterday using the constness patch from my previous mail > and my upstream fix for #422. For the record - with many thanks to nirik - this appears to be due to some shenanigans with RPM's handling of %doc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728959 in Ye Olde Olde Days, %doc ANY_RELATIVE_PATH would wipe %_pkgdocdir before installing the listed files to it - so if you wanted to keep stuff installed there during %install you couldn't use %doc in that way, you had to do it yourself. In Ye Somewhat Less Olde Days - between 2011 and four days ago - %doc didn't do that any more, and would happily include any files that were put in %_pkgdocdir during %install, without them needing to be listed in %files. For Rawhide, since four days ago (downstream - the change, I think, arrived in rpm-4.12.90-1.fc24; it landed on upstream master in April), we have a sort of happy medium apparently, where %doc does not clean %_pkgdocdir but the 'unpackaged files' check does apply to it - so if %install puts files there, you either have to delete them or list them in %files. And that's what broke the build here; the package's %install installs various things to %_pkgdocdir , but the %files section doesn't list them. I'll fix that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
