Excerpts from Peter Robinson's message of 2015-07-28 18:01 +10:00: > This is completely NOT appropriate, it breaks on secondary arches > where they then end up with no documentation due to the lack of any > x86_64. Please DO NOT do this and please revert the change on any > packages you might have made this change. I haven't used that hack on any of my packages but I learnt about it from the ipxe package which uses it to produce noarch subpackages containing boot images. I guess ipxe is broken on secondary arches as well, but it's acceptable for that package because the only alternative would be to make it x86-only? -- Dan Callaghan <dcallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations Red Hat, Inc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
