On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller > > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > >> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. > > >> If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is > > >> the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is > > >> there a replacement tool? > > > > > > What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives > > > me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged > > > installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in.... > > > > From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, > > but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use > > execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been > > bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time > > not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. > > we can query buildrequires: > > repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink > aide-0:0.15.1-10.fc23.src > anyterm-0:1.1.29-27.fc23.src > elpa-0:2015.02.002-5.fc23.src > gnu-smalltalk-0:3.2.5-9.fc23.src > gromacs-0:5.0.5-3.fc23.src > hugs98-0:2006.09-22.fc23.src > lightning-0:2.1.0-3.fc23.src > openblas-0:0.2.14-3.fc23.src > skychart-0:3.10-6.fc23.src > transgui-0:5.0.1-4.fc23.src > wine-0:1.7.47-1.fc23.src > zfs-fuse-0:0.7.0-21.fc23.src More 2: repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack pypy-0:2.5.0-1.fc23.src pypy3-0:2.4.0-2.fc23.src Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
