On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. > >> If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is > >> the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is > >> there a replacement tool? > > > > What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives > > me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged > > installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in.... > > From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, > but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use > execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been > bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time > not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. we can query buildrequires: repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink aide-0:0.15.1-10.fc23.src anyterm-0:1.1.29-27.fc23.src elpa-0:2015.02.002-5.fc23.src gnu-smalltalk-0:3.2.5-9.fc23.src gromacs-0:5.0.5-3.fc23.src hugs98-0:2006.09-22.fc23.src lightning-0:2.1.0-3.fc23.src openblas-0:0.2.14-3.fc23.src skychart-0:3.10-6.fc23.src transgui-0:5.0.1-4.fc23.src wine-0:1.7.47-1.fc23.src zfs-fuse-0:0.7.0-21.fc23.src -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
