Re: Granting a capability to a service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday, July 20, 2015 11:09:39 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Jul 20, 2015 11:05 AM, "Florian Weimer" <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 07/20/2015 05:59 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
>> > > Today, any application that wants to manipulate capabilities needs to be
>> > > capability aware.
>> >
>> > The application does not want to manipulate capabilities.  I do not want
>> > to run it as full root.  I don't want to add additional SUID/fscaps to
>> > the file system.
>> >
>> > It's somewhat silly to add a privilege escalation hatch to the file
>> > system in order to run a daemon with *reduced* privileges.
>>
>> This is exactly why the ambient caps patch is sitting in -mm.  If you want
>> to read it and email a quick review, that might help it along.  :)
>
> The real problem with capabilities is there is no way to say, I trust this
> child process with this capability, but don't let it get inherited beyond this
> process that I'm about to start.

Why would you want to do that?  That sounds like a use for LD_PRELOAD.

--Andy
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux