On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 10:31 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > While investigating a problem with one of my packages regarding > systemd I noticed there there is an inconsistency with instructions > on how to get a service enabled by default. > > The packaging scriptlet page[1] says: > If your package includes one or more systemd units that need to be > enabled by default on package installation, they need to be covered > by the default Fedora preset policy. The default fedora preset policy > is shipped as part of systemd.rpm. If your unit files are missing > from this list, please file a bug against the systemd package. Only > services covered by the policy on which services that may be enabled > by default on package installation are eligible for this, and you > will need to receive special permission from FESCo to have a package > start a service by default if it is not covered by the existing > policy. > > While the Packaging:DefaultServices page[2] says: > For services which meet one of the conditions listed above, a ticket > should be filed against the fedora-release package. If the preset > should be changed for versions other than rawhide, indicate that in > the ticket. > > So one says to file the bug against systemd, the other says to file > it against fedora-release. > > Which one is it? > The presets have been moved to fedora-release. Please file bugs there.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
