Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed > that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to > Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random > patchlevel (some even use reverse patches). > > %autosetup was created to handle that but probably less than 5% of > packages use it. Why? autosetup is still fairly new. It's been only half a year since it was announced that a mention had been added to the Packaging Guidelines, which was probably when I first heard of it. Could it be that maintainers don't see a pressing need to change their working packages just for the sake of introducing autosetup, but have slowly begun using it when they're overhauling the spec and patches anyway? Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpALQapE8sfl.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
