Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I
>> noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it
>> comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files
>> of random patchlevel (some even use reverse patches).
> 
> While not answering your question about %autosetup, I want to say this
> bit isn't quite true.  Some packages use an external git repo for
> patch management, and create the 'Patch...' lines semi-automatically.
> (Similar to, but less weird than: https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit)
> 
> %autosetup only handles half of this use case.  TBH it handles the bit
> that was already quite easy to do -- ie. invoking 'git am'.
> 
> Copying the patches from git and inserting the Patch lines is the hard
> part, and it would be nice to have some standardized tooling for that,
> instead of everyone's homebrew 'copy-patches.sh' script.

maybe pull `rdopkg update-patches` into `fedpkg` ?

cheers,
Pádraig.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux