Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think it's because no one told that it exists ;)

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
<mjuszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that
> there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages.
> Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random patchlevel (some even
> use reverse patches).
>
> %autosetup was created to handle that but probably less than 5% of packages
> use it. Why?
>
> Is it because no one told that it exists? Or maybe because implementation
> has some issues which no one wants to fix? Or other (I exclude laziness of
> package maintainers)?
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct



-- 
-Igor Gnatenko
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux