On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 10:05 -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:53:51PM +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > Without looking too much into SPDX license list - would some of the > > licenses we currently consider MIT fall under different license name > > under SPDX? > > No, because they wouldn't have any standard name. As I understand it, > SPDX has created a set of abbreviations meant to cover the most > commonly-encountered license texts or license notices. Most of the > licenses that Fedora classifies as "MIT" would not have any SPDX name > (maybe even all but the OSI-style MIT license). Hilariously, X.org's standard license text (as found near the top of xserver/COPYING) would match neither SPDX's "MIT" nor its "X11" license. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
