2015-07-09 16:21 GMT+02:00 Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 09:42:55AM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: >> I'm hesitant to go down this road for a number of reasons: > [...] >> 5) It implies that we're planning on implementing the full SPDX >> specification. And we're not. > > This last one is a big concern for me. What I've been seeing, and I > don't mean to suggest this is some intentional sinister scheme, is > that the confusion between the SPDX abbreviation system and the full > SPDX spec is being used to make the full SPDX effort look more viable > or popular than it actually is. > > RF > >From my PoV, the abbreviation system is already an improvement, if it's commonly shared with other distros (and Suse already switched to it). H. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
