Re: [Fedora-legal-list] [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:14:36PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
>> 2015-07-09 14:24 GMT+02:00 Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > What distros or upstream projects are actually using the SPDX format?
>> > I am not aware of any.
>> >
>>
>> Currently Suse is using it, they even patched their packaging compliance
>> checkers to support it.
>
> To support the *format* or the *abbreviations*? In every discussion of
> SPDX I have found that these two things are mixed up, so I have to ask
> the question.

I asked the same thing.  I'm reasonably sure SuSE is not providing
full SPDX format files and we are instead just speaking about the
abbreviations.  It would be good to get an answer from Haikel though.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux