Re: [Fedora-legal-list] [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:14:36PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> 2015-07-09 14:24 GMT+02:00 Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > What distros or upstream projects are actually using the SPDX format?
> > I am not aware of any.
> >
> 
> Currently Suse is using it, they even patched their packaging compliance
> checkers to support it.

To support the *format* or the *abbreviations*? In every discussion of
SPDX I have found that these two things are mixed up, so I have to ask
the question.

RF
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux