On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:22:38AM -0400, Radek Holy wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:05:41 PM > > Subject: Re: F23 System Wide Change: Python 3 as Default > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:50:14AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote: > > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3 as Default = > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default > > > > > > Change owner(s): > > > * Slavek Kabrda <bkabrda at redhat dot com> > > > * Matej Stuchlik <mstuchli at redhat dot com> > > > * Miro Hroncok <mhroncok at redhat dot com> > > > * Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject dot org> > > > * Robert Kuska <rkuska at redhat dot com> > > > > > > Up until now, Fedora has used Python 2 as the default Python > > > implementation. This change proposes switching to Python 3. The details of > > > the term "switching" are explained thoroughly in the Scope section. > > > > > > == Detailed Description == > > > It is currently mature and stable, since it has been under active > > > development for five years > > More than that, I'm sure. > > > > > == Scope == > > > The main goal is switching to Python 3 as a default, in which state: > > > * DNF is the default package manager instead of Yum, which only works > > > with Python 2 > > Does that mean that dnf-3 is going to become the default which is installed > > as /usr/bin/dnf? > > Will "old" dnf be available as /usr/bin/dnf-2? > Why and how long would you need the "old" DNF? dnf-2 and dnf-3 are functionally the same. I don't need it at all :), both work fine for me. I was just asking because I think it is good to be very clear about such details and the Change page is vague in some places. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
