From: "Sandro Mani" <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:01:12 PM
Subject: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same providesHello,
Investigating bug #1230838, I noticed that when installing mmg3d-libs, dnf installs ptscotch-mpich, whereas yum-deprecated installs scotch. Both scotch and ptscotch-mpich provide the required libscotch.so.0()(64bit), albeit one in /usr/lib64/ and the other one in /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/:
$ dnf repoquery --requires mmg3d-libs
[...]
libscotch.so.0()(64bit)
libscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)
[...]
$ dnf provides 'libscotch.so.0()(64bit)'
ptscotch-mpich-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : PT-Scotch libraries compiled against mpich
Repo : rawhide
ptscotch-openmpi-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : PT-Scotch libraries compiled against openmpi
Repo : rawhide
scotch-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library
Repo : rawhide
Konsole output $ dnf repoquery -l scotch.x86_64 | grep libscotch.so.0
/usr/lib64/libscotch.so.0
/usr/lib64/libscotch.so.0.2
Konsole output $ dnf repoquery -l ptscotch-mpich.x86_64 | grep libscotch.so.0
/usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libscotch.so.0
/usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libscotch.so.0.2
$ dnf install mmg3d-libs
[...]
Installing:
environment-modules x86_64 3.2.10-14.fc23 rawhide 117 k
hwloc-libs x86_64 1.10.1-2.fc23 rawhide 1.3 M
lzma-libs x86_64 4.32.7-13.fc22 rawhide 38 k
mmg3d-libs x86_64 4.0.2-1.fc23 rawhide 211 k
mpich x86_64 3.1.4-3.fc23 rawhide 1.1 M
ptscotch-mpich
$ yum-deprecated install mmg3d-libs
[...]
Installing:
mmg3d-libs x86_64 4.0.2-1.fc23 rawhide 211 k
Installing for dependencies:
lzma-libs x86_64 4.32.7-13.fc22 rawhide 38 k
scotch
So, whose fault is this? Packaging of dnf? Nothing relevant for this caught my eye skimming through the packaging guidelines.
And related: trying to install some $pkg-openmpi package, I don't generally see packages enforcing that the -openmpi version of some dependency library is installed as opposed to just the regular libs package. Should such requires need to be stated explicitly?
Thanks,
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
If a package "Requires: foo" and both "bar" and "barbaz" "Provides: foo", they are handled as being equally suitable. DNF/libsolv is not going to prefer packages with shorter names.
--
Radek Holý
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct