Re: svn or arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 03:21:10PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> First, I think it's wacky to maintain patch files in revision control.
> If you want to look back at history, you're looking at a diff of a diff,
> which is just incomprehensible.  The right way to do this in my opinion
> is to have each patch be a direct branch of the upstream source.  If you
> have patch interdependencies, then you create a new branch which merges
> from the interdependent branches, just like how you have to adjust the
> patch files now.

It would be neat if I could do:

Patch: cvs://cvs.fedora.fedhat.com/....


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux