tor, 16.12.2004 kl. 23.21 skrev Nicolas Mailhot: > Le jeudi 16 décembre 2004 à 14:11 -0800, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > Why is it so? Why is those fonts, which it seem like > > > "everyone" thinks > > > are really ugly are used, when better fonts are > > > shipped? > > > > > > I have heard before that this is because the default > > fonts should be internationalised or something like > > that which bitstream fonts arent > > It might be worth taking a new look now that the deja variant of vera is > announcing new glyphs every other months. Of course we're far from full > unicode coverage, but fontconfig will fall back on Luxi if needed, so... Would that mean that if we used the nice fonts as default, everyone wanting to read a document with common glyphs would have no problem reading it (both glyphwise and readabilitywise) - and those who has a doc with less common glyphs, would get a mix? Or will the get only "old" glyps in those docs? So for those who uses common glyphs, it will be a good thing, and it won't hurt those who use less common glyps? What are we waiting for? Kyrre
