Re: Choice of default fonts in webrowsers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 16 dÃcembre 2004 Ã 14:11 -0800, Rahul Sundaram a Ãcrit :
> Hi
> 
> 
> > 
> > Why is it so? Why is those fonts, which it seem like
> > "everyone" thinks
> > are really ugly are used, when better fonts are
> > shipped?
> 
> 
> I have heard before that this is because the default
> fonts should be internationalised or something like
> that which bitstream fonts arent

It might be worth taking a new look now that the deja variant of vera is
announcing new glyphs every other months. Of course we're far from full
unicode coverage, but fontconfig will fall back on Luxi if needed, so...

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux