Am 03.06.2015 um 14:02 schrieb Petr Spacek:
On 3.6.2015 13:45, Reindl Harald wrote:I'm sorry for disappointing you. The behavior I describe is standard for last ~ 20 years 1987 (RFCs 1034/1035/2308). If you don't agree with standard then you cannot use DNS technology as standardized. Here I'm not sure if other Fedora users would also welcome non-standard behavior. If you feel that the standard is broken then *please* continue with discussion on IETF's dnsop mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsopcome on stop trolling that way because you know exactly what i am talking about by "broken client software" - the point is that with caching on each and every device you lose the oppotinity clear central caches for whatever reason and make the changes visible on all clients in realtimeYou will lose the ability because *you configured the zone with inappropriately long TTL*
no, you lose the ability only when each and every device maintains it's own cache while TTL is normally meant for resolvers and you don't need more than *one* trustable and redundant resolver for a whole LAN
with that *one* flush on that resolver would lead in the desired result for the whole network and you don't need hacks like dns views for the own LAN with a very low TTL while you don't want that for the rest of the world
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
