On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 07:49:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I don't think your logic is flawed, but there do appear to be more > builds for the combined "unison-legacy" package -- see my figures > here, assuming "unison-legacy" would cover the first three packages. Actually, your figures over-inflate things. Going back to February 2008, when 2.27 and 2.13 split, there are only _two_ changes which only affect one or the other of the packages, one a bugfix and the other a spec file cleanup (as part of a mass cleanup). So, together or separate, the number of updates is virtually the same. On the other hand, the number of unique changes to unison240 is somewhat higher (although I don't think we're in the top percentile of package churn in any case). -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
