On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 07:01:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I think the problem is almost everyone would be using unison-legacy, > since that would be the only version compatible with the broader > ecosystem of Unison servers (by which I mean Debian). > > So it doesn't really solve the "unnecessary updates" problem, if that > is really a problem. Well, presuambly, the frequently-changing package would be the non-legacy one which is under active development, right? So, unison-legacy wouldn't change often at all. Any non-critical fixes to it, including "graduation"of non-legacy to legacy, could be done in Rawhide, where mass rebuilds are likely to happen anyway, so all of the almost-everyone using the legacy package would only see a new package on system upgrade. (Or is my logic here flawed?) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
