On 05/01/2015 01:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 15:15 +0200, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
Is there a minimum requirement what should a common package provide
or
is it just arbitrary?
There's no real requirement. Personally 'common' is the name I'd most
likely expect, with one proviso; I kinda expect a package named
'common' to be basically useless on its own, and exist *solely* for
this purpose (to provide resources shared between two other packages).
If the shared package contains enough stuff to actually be useful in
some way on its own, I'd probably expect it to have another name, like
'core'.
Adam, thanks for sharing. I like this idea.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
