On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 15:15 +0200, Jan Chaloupka wrote: > Is there a minimum requirement what should a common package provide > or > is it just arbitrary? There's no real requirement. Personally 'common' is the name I'd most likely expect, with one proviso; I kinda expect a package named 'common' to be basically useless on its own, and exist *solely* for this purpose (to provide resources shared between two other packages). If the shared package contains enough stuff to actually be useful in some way on its own, I'd probably expect it to have another name, like 'core'. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
