> none of such soname changes should happen there Exactly, it should not. I think this is a mistake of the maintainer and not Fedora. I certainly think twice about my Fedora updates. J. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcin Juszkiewicz" <mjuszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxxx> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 4:24:38 PM Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum W dniu 10.04.2015 o 12:46, Ralf Corsepius pisze: > Just think about what recently has happened this week in F21: > (probably unnoticed to the fast majority of users): Somebody pushed > an SONAME-changing/ABI-braking update to cloog, cloog-ppl, isl. > > This broke all packages which were depending the old libcloog.so. > Seemingly there weren't any in Fedora, but 3rd party repos may carry > such. And magically that became DNF issue? Such fuckup (sorry, but there is no better word) is rather example of bad package repo management. F21 is RELEASED version - none of such soname changes should happen there. I know, I came from Debian/Ubuntu world where things are done in other way but a way how Fedora is developed AFTER it gets released scares me too often. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
