From: "Przemek Klosowski" <przemek.klosowski@xxxxxxxx>
To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 5:13:49 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yumOn 04/09/2015 11:05 AM, Michal Luscon wrote:
On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:Well, OK, but when I just re-run 'dnf update' it updates firefox now:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015^^^ the key part of DNF output
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015
^^^ same timestamp as before, but different result
...
Dependencies resolved.
...
firefox x86_64 37.0.1-1.fc21 updates 69 M
This is a definition of craziness: you do the same thing twice and expect a different return. In the end, I can't say that it doesn't work but I have an uneasy feeling that I do not understand how an essential part of my system works.
The reason is that even if metadata of the "updates" repository have been refreshed, there is probably another repository with matadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015 (it has probably longer expiration period). So, yes, I agree that this is confusing.
Do you have a better idea than printing the timestamp for each repository?
--
Radek Holý
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
