Am 09.04.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wroteI'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that we will be as compatible as possible in terms of CLI but we never wanted to have just another yum. If that was the case, we wouldn't call the project differently.I am concerned that the yum-to-dnf transition is confusing, because of this mixed message. On one hand, they are just two package management tools: on a high level, they do a simple, well defined job of updating your system to the latest version of available packages. In an ideal world it just wouldn't matter which one you use, and from that point of view the name change is superfluous: all you need to do is 'yum update', and calling it 'dnf update' is just a tiny annoyance that is not bothersome enough to be worth bothering about
nobody cares about the annoyancewhile the original promise was "dnf will be a fork of current yum and later renamed back to yum" this no longer bothers anybody and it was decided that user confusion is no problem as long as developer egos are fine
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
