Re: review or review swap for spooky-c?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:16:25 +0100
Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> 
> On 1 April 2015 at 16:00, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm trying to get this library added to Fedora. It's quite small and
> > the code is public domain:
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
> >
> > An unsponsored reviewer has already had a look and I've addressed his
> > comments, but I need someone who can officially review it.
> 
> 
> It's good practice to repost the Spec: <url> and SRPM: <url> with each
> update to the package so that fedora-review will work correctly given
> the review BZ number. Not doing so doesn't lend your package to prompt
> review :). Also, you should certainly address the last point raised in
> the BZ ticket about github sources.

Thanks for taking a look. I've updated the package in accordance with
github source generation. If you or anyone else can help review this,
it'd be greatly appreciated:

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376#c9

Thanks!
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux