Re: review or review swap for spooky-c?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jeff,

On 1 April 2015 at 16:00, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm trying to get this library added to Fedora. It's quite small and
> the code is public domain:
>
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
>
> An unsponsored reviewer has already had a look and I've addressed his
> comments, but I need someone who can officially review it.


It's good practice to repost the Spec: <url> and SRPM: <url> with each
update to the package so that fedora-review will work correctly given
the review BZ number. Not doing so doesn't lend your package to prompt
review :). Also, you should certainly address the last point raised in
the BZ ticket about github sources.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux