Re: Koji build failure: noarch vs. arch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry, upon closer review doesn't look like that quite matches.  Couldn't find a bug... if someone knows of one, please let me know, otherwise I'll create one.  I used the workaround, and that worked fine btw; but doesn't seem like it should be the solution.

Thanks!

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote:
I found the bug:  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141513

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:44 PM, gil <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
a fix for this problem is:
(see http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wrapper.spec
 
)
# rpmbuild < 4.6 support
%if ! 0%{?__isa_bits}
%ifarch x86_64 ia64 ppc64 sparc64 s390x alpha ppc64le aarch64
%global __isa_bits 64
%else
%global __isa_bits 32
%endif
%endif

I've just run into this problem with the sphinx build - which built fine with 2.2.7-1 on January 21st - which was before this thread started. Is the workaround the recommendation?  Was a mock bug created?


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux