On 28 March 2015 at 15:07, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I maintained a slowly evolving approach in Mandriva for some years, > (but now it is quickly approaching one year I left Mandriva...), see the > main script at > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/texlive-tlpkg/blob/master/tlpobj2spec.pl > It uses the texlive perl modules to do most of the work, and only does > some filtering on contents, choosing %doc (what texlive calls doc > and source), extracting dependencies or license information, %post > scripts, etc. > This looks really handy. I wonder though about the need to really have one RPM per texlive package.Would it not be a reasonable middle ground to generate one SRPM per texlive collection? [snip] > It is quite a lot of work, so, it would be better to have a SIG and > not let only one person handle all packages. > I would be interested in joining such a SIG and effort. Jonathan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
