>>>>> "KL" == Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> writes: KL> What do you mean with "were required to" ? There were many discussions during and after the big texlive license audit as to how to properly package the software. I can no longer remember exact dates because it's been a while; maybe someone else has a better memory. Personally I preferred the "thousand package review" scenario, but that never happened. Having a small number of subpackages, however, was never really something we on the packaging committee, at least, would have allowed. But after that, we had no real input on how the actual package was structured. It certainly could have been done in a better manner than a 16MB, machine generated spec. Intervention there would have to have been made by the package reviewer, and that didn't happen. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
