On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18/03/15 11:55, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller >> <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that >>> "instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a >>> minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of >>> course we want Fedora to be international, but there are many cases >>> like Docker containers where no human is really even looking inside, so >>> it's just overhead.) >>> >>> In the cloud and docker images, we've been carrying horribly hacks >>> (really, horrible) to strip this out ofter the fact. The new fix would >>> let us get the same effect the right way. I'm told that this is a >>> low-risk change and does not affect the rest of glibc. So, the question >>> -- I guess mostly for FESCo, but in general -- is: should we get this >>> in before the beta, or should it wait for F23? >> >> >> Isn't this causing RPM dependency issues when trying to create rawhide >> chroots on RHEL6 hosts via mock? I am fairly sure it's the reason >> COPR rawhide chroots are failing. If so, then I don't think we want >> it in f22 until that is fixed. > > > Didn't this commit fix that? > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150316/1539279.html Ah, from yesterday. I hadn't seen that yet. I hope it does, because I have things to build in Rawhide COPRs :). Still, I would suggest waiting at least a few days to see if there is any other fallout before we consider it for f22. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
