On 03/16/2015 06:48 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote: > If the working group deems the software to be that useful, wouldn't it be better to bring its packaging up to the > quality of the "official" Fedora repo, and make it more easily discoverable by all Fedora users, regardless of whether > they choose to use that "product" or a spin or a "non-product" install of Fedora? Another example - I have two projects in Copr: * spark-cli - command line interface for Spark Core * nanoblogger - blog with just static pages generated by bash sript I have no intention to get them into main Fedora. Mostly because I am not willing to fix bugs. I just packaged it for myself. It works for me and it may work most people. Therefore I assume that it may be useful for somebody out there. We (as Fedora) simply could not package and maintain everything with the same quality. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
